Open to work · RemotoContactar

Proyectos de Data & Analytics

Analytics engineering, machine learning y análisis estadístico — del dato crudo al modelo limpio y al insight accionable.

E-Commerce Data Platform — Olist Brazil100k+ órdenes · Analytics Engineering

E-Commerce Data Platform — Olist Brazil

Pipeline de datos end-to-end sobre 100k+ órdenes reales del mercado brasileño (Olist). PostgreSQL + dbt con 4 capas de modelos: staging → intermediate → marts. RFM segmentation, cohort retention, revenue trends y seller performance — todo en SQL puro. Análisis y documentación en portugués (C1). CI/CD con GitHub Actions.

PostgreSQLdbtPythonDockerSQLRFMCohort AnalysisGitHub Actions
-- mart_rfm_segmentation.sql (dbt model)
WITH rfm_base AS (
  SELECT
    customer_unique_id,
    DATEDIFF('day', MAX(order_purchase_timestamp),
             CURRENT_DATE)                    AS recency,
    COUNT(DISTINCT order_id)                  AS frequency,
    SUM(payment_value)                        AS monetary
  FROM {{ ref('int_orders_enriched') }}
  WHERE order_status = 'delivered'
  GROUP BY 1
),
rfm_scores AS (
  SELECT *,
    NTILE(5) OVER (ORDER BY recency DESC)     AS r_score,
    NTILE(5) OVER (ORDER BY frequency)        AS f_score,
    NTILE(5) OVER (ORDER BY monetary)         AS m_score
  FROM rfm_base
)
SELECT *,
  CASE
    WHEN r_score >= 4 AND f_score >= 4 THEN 'Champions'
    WHEN r_score >= 3 AND f_score >= 3 THEN 'Loyal'
    WHEN r_score >= 4 AND f_score <= 2 THEN 'New Customers'
    WHEN r_score <= 2 AND f_score >= 3 THEN 'At Risk'
    ELSE 'Hibernating'
  END AS segment
FROM rfm_scores
Athlete Performance Monitor — Demo Dataset6.500+ mediciones · Privacy-first

Athlete Performance Monitor — Demo Dataset

Dataset sintético de 6.500+ mediciones CMJ/IMTP generado con Python. Faker + numpy con distribuciones calibradas en literatura de sport science. Sistema de alertas neuromusculares con umbrales dinámicos p25/p75 y media móvil de 5 evaluaciones. IDs hasheados desde el origen — 0 datos personales reales.

PythonnumpyFakerSQLWindow FunctionsSport Science
# Distribuciones calibradas con normas publicadas
SPORTS = {
    "Fútbol":     {"cmj": (42, 6),  "imtp": (1_800, 300)},
    "Rugby":      {"cmj": (45, 7),  "imtp": (2_200, 350)},
    "Atletismo":  {"cmj": (50, 8),  "imtp": (2_000, 300)},
    "Basketball": {"cmj": (55, 8),  "imtp": (1_900, 300)},
}

def hash_id(raw: str) -> str:
    return "ATH" + hashlib.sha256(raw.encode()).hexdigest()[:6].upper()

# Faker genera nombre → se hashea → nombre descartado
raw_name = fake.name()
athlete_id = hash_id(raw_name + sport)  # único, anónimo

# Fatiga modelada como ruido multiplicativo ±7%
fatigue   = float(rng.normal(1.0, 0.07))
jump_h    = max(15.0, base_cmj * fatigue + rng.normal(0, 1.5))
max_force = max(500.0, base_imtp * fatigue + rng.normal(0, 30))
Performance Monitoring System — Ivolution967 atletas · 13 deportes

Performance Monitoring System — Ivolution

967 atletas monitoreados en 13 deportes. Alertas de tres estados (SUPERCOMPENSACIÓN / ATENCIÓN / FATIGADO) con umbrales dinámicos por percentil (p25/p75), 10.000+ mediciones registradas y soporte multilingüe ES/EN/PT. El sistema continúa operativo tras mi salida — herramienta principal de decisiones de la organización.

SQLBigQuerydbtMetabasePythonAnalytics Engineering
-- athlete_fatigue_alerts.sql (BigQuery + dbt)
WITH athlete_baseline AS (
  SELECT
    athlete_id,
    exercise_type,
    PERCENTILE_CONT(max_force, 0.25)
      OVER (PARTITION BY athlete_id, exercise_type) AS p25,
    PERCENTILE_CONT(max_force, 0.75)
      OVER (PARTITION BY athlete_id, exercise_type) AS p75
  FROM {{ ref('stg_measurements') }}
  WHERE eval_date >= DATE_SUB(CURRENT_DATE(), INTERVAL 90 DAY)
),
latest_eval AS (
  SELECT DISTINCT ON (athlete_id, exercise_type)
    athlete_id, exercise_type, max_force, eval_date
  FROM {{ ref('stg_measurements') }}
  ORDER BY athlete_id, exercise_type, eval_date DESC
)
SELECT
  l.athlete_id,
  l.exercise_type,
  l.max_force,
  b.p25, b.p75,
  CASE
    WHEN l.max_force >= b.p75 THEN 'SUPERCOMPENSACIÓN'
    WHEN l.max_force <= b.p25 THEN 'FATIGADO'
    ELSE 'ATENCIÓN'
  END AS estado
FROM latest_eval l
JOIN athlete_baseline b USING (athlete_id, exercise_type)
Segmentación de Usuarios — Email Marketing212.292 usuarios · 6 segmentos

Segmentación de Usuarios — Email Marketing

Segmentación no supervisada sobre 212.292 registros reales de campañas de mailing. Aplica K-Means y MiniBatchKMeans con análisis de Silhouette Score para determinar el k óptimo (6 segmentos). Reducción dimensional con PCA para visualización. Output: archivo Excel con asignación de cluster y recomendaciones de estrategia personalizadas por segmento.

PythonK-MeansPCASilhouette ScoreScikit-learnClustering
from sklearn.cluster import MiniBatchKMeans
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.metrics import silhouette_score
import pandas as pd

scaler = StandardScaler()
X_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(df[features])

# Silhouette analysis to find optimal k
scores = {}
for k in range(2, 11):
    model = MiniBatchKMeans(n_clusters=k, random_state=42)
    labels = model.fit_predict(X_scaled)
    scores[k] = silhouette_score(X_scaled, labels, sample_size=5000)

optimal_k = max(scores, key=scores.get)  # k=6

final_model = MiniBatchKMeans(n_clusters=optimal_k, random_state=42)
df['cluster'] = final_model.fit_predict(X_scaled)

# Cluster profiling
profile = df.groupby('cluster')[features].mean()
profile['size'] = df['cluster'].value_counts()
IBM HR Analytics — Predicción de Deserción1.470 empleados

IBM HR Analytics — Predicción de Deserción

Análisis end-to-end sobre el dataset oficial de IBM con 1.470 empleados. Identifica los factores con mayor impacto en la rotación laboral mediante Random Forest con matriz de confusión y métricas de clasificación. Segmentación con K-Means y visualización de clusters con PCA. Genera insights accionables para reducir el churn de RR.HH.

PythonRandom ForestK-MeansPCAScikit-learnSeaborn
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import classification_report
import pandas as pd

X = df.drop(columns=['Attrition'])
y = df['Attrition'].map({'Yes': 1, 'No': 0})

X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
    X, y, test_size=0.2, stratify=y, random_state=42
)

rf = RandomForestClassifier(
    n_estimators=200,
    class_weight='balanced',
    random_state=42
)
rf.fit(X_train, y_train)

print(classification_report(y_test, rf.predict(X_test)))

# Top drivers of attrition
importances = pd.Series(
    rf.feature_importances_, index=X.columns
).sort_values(ascending=False)
# OverTime, MonthlyIncome, Age top 3
NLP & Sentiment Analysis — Yelp Reviews27.290 reseñas

NLP & Sentiment Analysis — Yelp Reviews

Pipeline completo de Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural sobre 27.290 reseñas reales de Yelp (2005–2015). Análisis de sentimiento con TextBlob, Topic Modeling con LDA (5 temas: restaurantes, hotelería, retail, comida casual, cocinas especiales) y clustering semántico con K-Means sobre matriz TF-IDF. Insight clave: las reseñas más largas tienen sentimiento más negativo.

PythonNLTKTextBlobTF-IDFLDAK-MeansWordCloud
from textblob import TextBlob
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
from sklearn.decomposition import LatentDirichletAllocation

# Sentiment analysis
df['sentiment'] = df['text'].apply(
    lambda x: TextBlob(x).sentiment.polarity
)
df['label'] = pd.cut(df['sentiment'],
    bins=[-1, -0.1, 0.1, 1],
    labels=['negative', 'neutral', 'positive']
)

# Topic modeling with LDA
vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(max_features=5000, stop_words='english')
X = vectorizer.fit_transform(df['text_clean'])

lda = LatentDirichletAllocation(n_components=5, random_state=42)
lda.fit(X)

# Key insight: longer reviews → more negative sentiment
# corr(len(text), sentiment) = -0.18
Pipeline de Preprocesamiento — Weather AUSDataset Kaggle

Pipeline de Preprocesamiento — Weather AUS

Pipeline robusto sobre el dataset climático de Australia de Kaggle. Imputación estratégica de valores faltantes, encoding de variables categóricas, feature engineering y estandarización con StandardScaler. Base sólida y reproducible lista para cualquier modelo de clasificación de lluvia.

PythonPandasScikit-learnFeature EngineeringData Cleaning
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.impute import SimpleImputer
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler, LabelEncoder
from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer

num_pipeline = Pipeline([
    ('imputer', SimpleImputer(strategy='median')),
    ('scaler', StandardScaler()),
])
cat_pipeline = Pipeline([
    ('imputer', SimpleImputer(strategy='most_frequent')),
    ('encoder', LabelEncoder()),
])

preprocessor = ColumnTransformer([
    ('num', num_pipeline, numerical_cols),
    ('cat', cat_pipeline, categorical_cols),
])

X_train_processed = preprocessor.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_processed  = preprocessor.transform(X_test)
# Ready for any classifier — no leakage
House Price Prediction — Kaggle80+ variables · R² 0,84

House Price Prediction — Kaggle

Modelo de regresión sobre el dataset clásico de Kaggle con más de 80 features de propiedades residenciales. Pipeline completo: EDA, imputación de nulos, encoding, feature selection y modelado. Competencia clásica de regresión supervisada con variable objetivo SalePrice.

PythonPandasScikit-learnRegresiónFeature EngineeringEDA
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score

# Feature engineering
df['TotalSF']      = df['TotalBsmtSF'] + df['1stFlrSF'] + df['2ndFlrSF']
df['HouseAge']     = df['YrSold'] - df['YearBuilt']
df['RemodAge']     = df['YrSold'] - df['YearRemodAdd']
df['HasGarage']    = (df['GarageArea'] > 0).astype(int)
df['HasPool']      = (df['PoolArea'] > 0).astype(int)

# Log-transform skewed target
y_log = np.log1p(df['SalePrice'])

# Ridge regression with CV
model = Ridge(alpha=10)
scores = cross_val_score(model, X, y_log, cv=5, scoring='r2')
print(f"CV R² mean: {scores.mean():.4f}")  # ~0.84
Spotify Music Analysis — EDA2.000 canciones · 59 géneros

Spotify Music Analysis — EDA

Análisis exploratorio sobre 2.000 canciones de Spotify (1998–2020) con 59 géneros musicales. Correlación entre features de audio: danceability, energy, valence, tempo, instrumentalness. Visualizaciones de tendencias de popularidad por género y evolución temporal de las características musicales.

PythonPandasSeabornMatplotlibEDACorrelación
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

audio_features = [
    'danceability', 'energy', 'valence',
    'tempo', 'instrumentalness', 'acousticness'
]

# Correlation heatmap
corr = df[audio_features + ['popularity']].corr()
sns.heatmap(corr, annot=True, cmap='coolwarm', center=0)

# Popularity trend by decade
df['decade'] = (df['year'] // 10) * 10
trend = df.groupby('decade')['popularity'].mean()

# Key findings:
# energy ↑ → valence ↑ (r=0.39)
# instrumentalness ↑ → popularity ↓ (r=-0.28)
# acousticness ↑ over 2010–2020 (+12%)

Jupyter Notebooks & más análisis

Explorá todos mis notebooks y proyectos de análisis de datos en GitHub.

Ver en GitHub